December , 2014
Ridley Scott's telling of the story of Moses has numerous flaws. Better to read the
Good Book instead.
There are several film and television adaptations of the story of the Exodus and subsequent
events—most notably, of course, Cecil B. DeMille's classic 1956 epic, The Ten
Commandments—so director Ridley Scott had to do something distinct with Exodus: Gods
and Kings. Unfortunately, aside from one interesting (but not positive) development, most of
the film’s 150 minutes consists of a rehashing of old approaches and a reworking of ideas
that covered many times already.
Granted, these do come with some pretty awesome special effects, although the parting of
the Red Sea is still better in DeMille’s version, despite being produced almost sixty years ago
, with obvious technical limitations. In short, Exodus isn’t a bad movie, just one that’s better
enjoyed on DVD, with doughnuts, while writing a high school religion paper comparing the
biblical account to the cinematic re-telling.
The first half is almost verbatim a combination of The Ten Commandments and Dreamworks'
animated 1999 feature, The Prince of Egypt. Like Commandments, Scott paints an epic world
of towering statues, brilliant costumes, and exotic accents. LikePrince, Moses (Christian Bale)
and Ramses (Joel Edgerton) were raised together “as close as brothers,” then gradually
grow apart when a closely guarded secret is discovered.
Many good actors have played Moses, including Charlton Heston, Val Kilmer, and Mel Brooks
. Bale’s prophet is a pragmatic general who puts his faith in knowledge and skill rather than
the Egyptian religion. He would rather speak to the Hebrew elders than kill them, not because
they are equal but because it will halt sedition. Edgerton’s Ramses knows the responsibility
that will pass to him, and he wants to lead well, but he is often blinded by his own arrogance.
It’s bad enough being an only child; being constantly told that he is a god does not make
things easier.
In typical fashion, Moses is exiled, falls in love with Zipporah, and becomes a shepherd.
Never a believer, he suddenly meets God in a strange encounter that almost completely
ignores the biblical narrative. When Moses returns to Egypt, he first organizes a Hebrew
army that engages in guerilla warfare before God takes over and tells him to “sit back and
watch.”
The ten plagues begin with a swarm of crocodiles attacking a fleet of ordinary Egyptians.
This feeding frenzy—which is very graphic for a PG-13 film—causes the Nile to turn red,
which in turn drives frogs onto the land, which then dry and decompose, bringing swarms
of gnats. The implication is that although God is the impetus, these calamities are perfectly
reasonable from a scientific standpoint.
It is in the depiction of the suffering people that Exodus finds its most powerful theme.
Watching poor farmers starve and a woman suffocated by flies creates an intense empathy
for the Egyptians. The worst plague brings the Angel of Death, who steals the breath of
children in the night, leaving them lifeless. Ramses is not spared this divine wrath as he finds
his adorable infant son lifeless in his crib. Wailing uncontrollably, he tries to wake his only
child, shaking him like a ragdoll. “Is this your God,” he asks Moses, cradling the swaddled
corpse, “a child killer?”
It’s an incredibly honest question, and Moses seems taken aback by it. God does not author
evil. Rather, this action was the direct result of the Ramses pride; his son was a holy
innocent, just like the poor children who died at Herod’s hand or David and Bathsheba’s first
son—and the millions of children who die from infanticide, abortion, in vitro fertilization,
malnutrition, starvation, and abuse. They die because sin is present in the world, and every
person of good will has the solemn responsibility to protect them. “The Hebrew children
lived,” Moses responds. They were saved because their parents cared enough to follow God’s
law and place their trust in him.
Other than that brief exchange, Exodus rarely rises above the level of mediocrity. Its
depiction of God is strange and uneven at best. First, Moses does not encounter God in the
burning bush (see Exodus 3). Instead, God appears to Moses with the bush (in the
background) after the prophet nearly dies in a rockslide, allowing the viewer the option of
believing that the revelations seen and heard by Moses were mere hallucinations. Later,
when Joshua catches Moses talking to God, it appears that Moses is simply talking to
himself. Second, God is portrayed by a young boy (Issac Andrews) who is quite pushy and
rather scary. The credits claim he is actually an angel, but the film is unclear.
Exodus: Gods and Kings is an epic film of great scale and with impressive effects, but with
little substance or depth. Scott spends millions of dollars on displaying combat and miracles
but misses huge opportunities to flesh out the story and enter into the real drama. The
writing is uneven and sometimes awkward, and major figures—notably Aaron, the brother of
Moses, and Joshua, the successor of Moses—are essentially ignored. Aaron Paul, the
multiple Emmy winner from the mega-hit show, Breaking Bad, is cast as Joshua but has only
about five lines. Other fine actors, including Sigourney Weaver and Ben Kingsley, are hardly
used. And, finally, major events are given short shrift: it takes ten minutes for Moses to walk
across the desert in exile, but the golden calf and the giving of the commandments at Mount
Sinai are glossed over in seconds.
This film simply doesn’t bring much to the story and, at times, undermines the story. I rarely
ever say this, but the book really is better. Much better.
|
|