*The new atheism.



Interview to John Lennox, Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford(*):















You debated Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Peter Singer. Was it difficult to prove God’s existence during the debates?



Well, it’s not proof.You give evidence. But these debates are very, very difficult. You have to prepare for them and so on. But they are worth doing, because I want to get it into the public space that atheism is not the only intellectual possibility.



Your last book Gunning for God is dedicated to the new atheism. Can you explain to people who have not read your book what the new atheism is? Has atheism changed today?



The new atheism as an old atheism, except it’s much more aggressive. You know I have many atheist friends and they respect my believing in Christianity. We can discuss that and have a good dialogue. There is no aggression on either side. But the new atheism wants to destroy religion. That’s a very different thing. The arguments are not new, it’s the aggression that’s new. I’ve written a number of books, but the first main books addressed the scientific attack on Christianity in particular it was my first book God's Undertaker: Has Science Buried God? Then the new atheists also use a moral attack. So I wrote Gunning for God,which is a book that deals with moral objections to God. I also deal with the objections people raise against the Bibleand against the moralityof the Old Testament.



What advice can you give for Christians? How they should preach Gospel today?



We have to be prepared to answer people’s questions. People don’t like preaching, but discussion, presenting a case, and that’s important. Therefore, I think we need to learn to dialogue much more. For instance, I often go to a church on Sundays, and I say to the people, right at the beginning, not at the end, ‘What are your questions?’ I write down their questions and then I discuss them. The problem sometimes is in churches, that we are answering things that nobody is asking. It is very important that Christians engage one on one with their friends and do not rely on formal situations in a church. If you come to my lectures here, I teach the Bible dealing with the questions at the same time. It’s not the Bible here and the world over there. The questions are bringing the two together. And that has to be learnt.



To your mind what are the main questions that Christianity should answer today?



People are interested in basic things. Why do you believe there is a God? Is there life after death? Where can I find meaning for my life? How can you believe that Jesus is God when there are so many religions? What about suffering? Those are the questions that come up everywhere. They’re all are the same and they are important.






Can you share your story about how you’ve become a Christian?



Well, it’s not very sensational, because my parents were believers and they shared the Christian faith with me. But they taught me to think about it. They were very unusual. I’ve come from Northern Ireland which is the sectarian country. And often religion there is very narrow. Parents pressurize their children, but my parents did not. They allowed me to think, so I could come to my own decision. So I had the stage in development. When I became a Christian is not entirely clear. I probably was about 10 or 11, but when I got to Cambridge and people started asking questions about my faith, my commitment began developing. I could see that the case for Christianity, the evidence for Christianity is very strong. I believe it’s true, you see. That’s the important thing for me.



The majority of scientists do not believe in God, do they?



Well, that’s probably still correct in the West. The percentage is much higher for the average scientist (it is about 40%). Relatively, there are many scientists who believe in God. And in Oxford, where I am the Professor, there are more professors like me, who believe in God, than you think. There are not dozens of them, but they are there, and in Cambridge too, and elsewhere. We are not in a tiny minority.



And are there many Christian students in Oxford?



You could go to church on Sunday in Oxford, and you would have at least three churches where you would get 300 or 400 students in each of them. There is a lot of Christian activity among students. When I was a student in Cambridge, the Christian union was the biggest of all groups in the university. Christianity is a significant presence in British universities. And, for instance, if I give the lectures, like I’ll be doing in February in Oxford, on science and Christian belief, I would  expect probably a thousand students to come.

 ********************************************************************************************************



(*)In his exclusive interview to the Christian Telegraph, John Lennox, Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford, Fellow in Mathematics and the Philosophy of Science, and Pastoral Advisor at Green Templeton College, Oxford, spoke about Christianity, science and modern moral challenges.



He has written a number of books on the interface between science, philosophy and theology. These include "God's Undertaker: Has Science Buried God?" (2009), "God and Stephen Hawking", a response to "The Grand Design" (2011), "Gunning for God" on the new atheism (2011), and "Seven Days that Divide the World" on Genesis 1 (2011).
John Lennox debated Richard Dawkins on "The God Delusion" in the University of Alabama (2007) and on "Has Science buried God?" in the Oxford Museum of Natural History (2008). He has also debated Christopher Hitchens on the New Atheism (Edinburgh Festival, 2008) and the question of "Is God Great?" (Samford University, 2010), as well as Peter Singer on the topic of "Is there a God?" (Melbourne, 2011).



Lennox speaks English, Russian, French, German and Spanish. He is married and has three children and five grandchildren.