"If you had one of the early [C19 jab] batches, your risk of getting side effects was much, much higher than if you had one of the later batches...some of the later batches seem to have given no side effects whatsoever... Pfizer must have changed the vaccines along the way."
In this clip taken from a recent video posted by health and environmental campaigner, author, and semi-retired nurse lecturer John Campbell (), Vibeke Manniche (), an MD, PhD, author, scientist and lecturer, describes how two studies she's co-authored show that there has been significant batch-dependent variability (in terms of severe adverse events) for Pfizer's COVID injections.
Manniche, who co-authored the first study published on this topic in March 2023 with Max Schmelling et al., and now a second published in Medicine in August 2024, with Peter Riis Hansen et al., notes that both studies found significant batch variability for Pfizer's COVID injections; using data from both Sweden as well as Denmark—meaning, it seems, that this phenomenon is not country dependent.
"We told about the batch dependency. We told about the varying pattern, the varying safety signals, in this case, with Pfizer corona vaccines, where our studies, both on Danish and on Swedish data, has shown that risk of getting side effects very much depend if you had the corona vaccine, very much dependent on which batch you had," Manniche says. The physician and researcher adds, "if you had one of the early batches, your risk of getting side effects were much, much higher than if you had one of the later batches."
Furthermore, Manniche says that "some of the later batches seems to have given no side effects whatsoever." As a consequence of these findings, Manniche says that "Pfizer must have changed the vaccines along the way."
"My theory is that along the way, Pfizer did something to the vaccine, changed something in the process, transportation or, you know, many ways of changing it and probably also changed the efficacy, which means that maybe in the end, the vaccine had no efficacy whatsoever," Manniche says. She adds, "We don't know because we don't have these studies."
Partial transcription of clip:
"I want to focus a little on the questions that the audience had. We, my husband and I, my husband is Peter Riis Hansen. He's a professor in cardiology.
He's the senior author of our studies, and we were there to give a talk. We told about the batch dependency. We told about the varying pattern, the varying safety signals, in this case, with Pfizer corona vaccines, where our studies, both on Danish and on Swedish data, has shown that risk of getting side effects very much depend if you had the corona vaccine, very much dependent on which batch you had, which means that if you had one of the early batches, your risk of getting side effects were much, much higher than if you had one of the later batches.
"And actually, some of the later batches seems to have given none side effects whatsoever. And what it also showed was that, apparently, in this case, Pfizer must have changed the vaccines along the way. And we have only been focusing on the side effects, which could be, you lesser minor side effects, soreness or redness
around where you have the injection or more serious side effects and even death. But showing that there was a big difference for your risk of having side effects and that Pfizer did something to the vaccine along the way, I think it's important to stress that then we don't know whether the efficacy also changed.
"My theory is that along the way, Pfizer did something to the vaccine, changed something in the process, transportation or, you know, many ways of changing it and probably also changed the efficacy, which means that maybe in the end, the vaccine had none efficacy whatsoever. We don't know because we don't have these studies. But I want to focus on the questions from the audience because I thought the questions was very relevant. First of all, there was a big mistrust against the authorities. And I understand that because our study, our batch dependent studies, where they first came out with peer review for more than one and a half year ago, should have at least had had the authorities, not only in Denmark, but in all over the Western world, to stop and focus and reanalyze or just starting to analyze the data, which they haven't. Instead, they had and has ignored very varying findings on official and so I understand why people are mistrusting the authorities, the governments. I also understand why they don't why lack trust to the media, because the media is part of this narrative where they told anything about the as for example, our study, none whatsoever mainstream media has even mentioned the very varying findings of our studies, not only in Denmark, but all over the world.
"So the mainstream media is part of the sickness.
You can't trust them because they misinform the public.
They withhold very important data like these 2 studies, which both have been through peer review and have published. But nevertheless, so a mistrust against the
authorities, against the press, but mistrust concerning vaccines, the safety of vaccines. And we can see that from all over the world that people are over the world that people taking not only Pfizer and corona vaccines but vaccines as such. And that's, of course, in many aspects, worrying."