It caught my attention that Prevost wanted to revive Leo XIII's social doctrine, and I thought he could introduce all kinds of ideological outrages from woke agendas, in addition to reinforcing Masonic and modernist slogans, continuing Bergoglio's work. And I wasn't wrong, as can be seen below. The use of words like dialogue, bridges, union, universal brotherhood, climate change, immigration, fake news, and open criticism of what constitutes doctrine demonstrates that Leo XIV is another impostor following in the footsteps of the false Argentine prophet. Can we continue the fight to defend the Church after agonizingly battling Bergoglio for 12 years?
*
en.news reports:
Pope Leo XIV received today the Centesimus Annus Pro Pontifice
Foundation, which met in Rome for its General Assembly. He used the same
buzzwords that have contributed to ruin Francis' authority. Excerpts.
- "The Church’s social doctrine is in the service of building bridges of universal fraternity."
- "Let us help one another to build bridges through dialogue and encounter, joining together as one people."
-
"Pope Francis spoke of a 'polycrisis' when describing the dramatic
nature of our own age, which is marked by wars, climate change, growing
inequalities, forced and contested migration, stigmatized poverty,
disruptive technological innovations, job insecurity, and precarious
labor rights."
- "The Church’s social doctrine […]does not claim to possess a monopoly on truth."
- "Perhaps when we hear the word 'doctrine,' we tend to think of a set of religious ideas."
-
"Doctrine can be a synonym of science, discipline and knowledge.
Understood in this way, doctrine appears as the product of research,
and, consequently, of hypotheses, discussions, progress and setbacks -
all aimed at conveying a reliable, organized and systematic body of
knowledge about a given issue. Consequently, a doctrine is not the same
as an opinion. But it is rather a common, collective and even
multidisciplinary pursuit of truth."
- "Indoctrination is
immoral. It stifles critical judgment and undermines the sacred freedom
of respect for conscience, even if erroneous. It resists new notions and
rejects movement, change or the evolution of ideas in the face of new
problems."
- "There is so little dialogue around us. Shouting
often replaces it, not infrequently in the form of fake news and
irrational arguments proposed by a few loud voices."
Picture: Vatican Media, #newsVaguhapyml