Arcivescovo Carlo Maria Viganò
@CarloMVigano
Jorge Mario Bergoglio - like Annibale Bugnini and many others before him - could not act outside of fraud and deception, because in the light of the Truth his impostures would have been discovered and rejected. He therefore had to deceive the faithful, making them believe that the reason for the drastic limitations on the Traditional Mass imposed by “Traditionis Custodes” was to avoid divisions within the Church. In reality, he intended to cancel the Tridentine Rite because - and rightly so - he judged it heterogeneous and antithetical to the ecclesiology expressed by the reformed liturgy.
I wonder, however, whether the openly hostile behavior of the Bergoglians is not more honest - in its brazen evidence - than the liturgical (and theological) indifferentism of those who accept without problems the coexistence of two mutually exclusive rites, the Vetus and the Novus Ordo, one the praying voice of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, the other of the conciliar and synodal church (as proudly recognized by the architects of the reformed liturgy and by Bergoglio himself). Accepting this mixture places the supporters of “Summorum Pontificum” in the heretical fold of Vatican II, precisely because Benedict XVI tried to “normalize” an irreconcilable inconsistency and welcome into the conciliar pantheon the ceremonies but not the doctrine of the “old Church”, of the “pre-conciliar Church”.
The divine κόσμος does not admit dissonant voices: the Divine Bridegroom wants to be honored by His Bride with the royal praise of the Domina gentium, not with the nonsense of the Novus Ordo Sæculorum.